Israel warns that reduced US footprint could embolden Ankara and shift regional power balance
The United States is preparing to cut its military presence in Syria by nearly half, officials confirmed Tuesday, sparking unease in Israel over potential consequences for regional stability. The reduction—expected to begin within two months—would see the 2,000-strong American force shrink to around 1,000 personnel, according to sources speaking to Reuters.
The decision marks a strategic shift in US engagement in Syria, where troops have been embedded for years to support Kurdish-led forces and contain the lingering threat of Islamic State. But the implications go beyond counterterrorism, as regional players like Turkey, Iran, and Russia eye expanded influence in the vacuum.
Washington Notifies Jerusalem, But Concerns Linger
Israel has been briefed on the decision, according to reports by Ynet, but that hasn’t eased fears in Jerusalem.
One senior Israeli official described the move as “deeply concerning,” warning it could encourage Ankara to accelerate its ambitions in northern Syria. “The less the US is present, the more room Turkey will feel it has to act,” the official reportedly told Israeli media.
The US and Israel maintain close military coordination, particularly in areas like Syria where their interests intersect. But in this case, Jerusalem is lobbying Washington to at least limit the scale of the withdrawal.
Turkey’s Eyes on Syria
Turkey has long sought to push deeper into Syrian territory—ostensibly to create a “safe zone” buffer against Kurdish militias it deems terrorists. That goal has put Ankara at odds not only with Kurdish forces but also with US policy, which has relied heavily on the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), a Kurdish-led coalition, in the fight against ISIS.
Israeli defense officials are especially worried that a weakened American footprint could embolden Turkey to take unilateral military action, further destabilizing the already volatile border zones.
One Israeli defense analyst told Channel 12 that Ankara’s potential moves could “disrupt the fragile balance” that has been painstakingly maintained since the fall of ISIS’s so-called caliphate.
The Numbers on the Ground
Here’s a quick look at how the US military footprint currently stands in Syria and what could change in the coming months:
| Metric | Current (Approx.) | Expected After Drawdown |
|---|---|---|
| US Troops in Syria | 2,000 | 1,000 |
| Primary Deployment Region | Northeast Syria | Same |
| Mission Focus | Counter-ISIS, Local Partnership | Same but leaner |
Despite the drawdown, Pentagon officials have emphasized that the core mission of supporting local anti-ISIS efforts remains intact.
Still, critics argue that fewer boots on the ground inevitably means less flexibility to respond to threats or shifting alliances. And the messaging itself—reducing presence in a hot zone—could send the wrong signal to adversaries watching closely.
Strategic Implications Beyond Syria
It’s not just about Syria. It’s about perception.
A scaled-down US presence could rattle partners across the region—from Iraqi Kurds to Gulf allies—who rely on American security guarantees. It might also open the door for Iran-backed militias or Russian contractors to expand their reach.
Israel, already dealing with heightened security threats on multiple fronts, is acutely aware of this ripple effect.
An Israeli official speaking on condition of anonymity said, “The concern isn’t only what happens in eastern Syria—it’s about the entire security architecture. When one part shifts, everything else reacts.”
What Comes Next?
The timeline is still fluid. Officials said the reduction would unfold “over weeks and months,” depending on conditions on the ground and coordination with local partners.
-
Israel is expected to continue pressing Washington behind the scenes.
-
US military leaders are reportedly planning to consolidate remaining troops at fewer bases.
-
The Kurdish-led SDF has not yet publicly commented on the planned reduction.
So far, neither the White House nor the Pentagon has offered an official statement confirming the move or outlining a new strategy. But insiders suggest that the shift is part of a broader recalibration of US priorities in the Middle East.
In a region where symbolic gestures matter as much as material ones, cutting troop numbers—especially without a public rationale—could end up speaking volumes.
