San Francisco residents and visitors will soon be able to enjoy a new transportation option: robotaxis. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) voted on Thursday to allow two robotaxi companies, Cruise and Waymo, to operate their driverless vehicles across the city at all hours of the day, with an unlimited number of vehicles. The companies will also be able to charge fares for their rides, competing with traditional taxis and ride-hailing services.
Cruise and Waymo are among the leading companies in the autonomous vehicle industry, with years of testing and development under their belts. Cruise is a subsidiary of General Motors (GM), while Waymo is part of Google’s parent company Alphabet (GOOGL). Both companies have been operating their robotaxi services in San Francisco for some time, but with limited hours, areas, and vehicles. They also could not charge for their rides without a driver on board.

The CPUC’s decision marks a major milestone for the robotaxi industry, as it allows the companies to expand their operations and generate revenue from their services. It also reflects the CPUC’s confidence in the safety and reliability of the driverless technology, which has been improving over time.
Robotaxi companies face challenges and opportunities
However, the robotaxi companies still face some challenges and opportunities in their quest to provide a convenient and affordable transportation alternative to San Francisco’s residents and visitors. Some of the factors that could affect their success are:
- Regulatory compliance: The robotaxi companies will have to comply with the rules and regulations set by the CPUC and other authorities, such as the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). They will also have to report data on their operations, such as miles driven, passengers served, incidents occurred, and complaints received. They will also have to respect the local laws and norms of San Francisco, such as traffic rules, parking regulations, and environmental standards.
- Public acceptance: The robotaxi companies will have to win over the public’s trust and acceptance of their driverless vehicles, which may still face skepticism or resistance from some people. They will have to demonstrate that their vehicles are safe, reliable, and comfortable for passengers, as well as respectful of other road users, such as pedestrians, cyclists, and human drivers. They will also have to address the concerns of some groups, such as taxi drivers, labor unions, and activists, who may oppose or protest against their services for various reasons.
- Market competition: The robotaxi companies will have to compete with other transportation options in San Francisco, such as public transit, personal vehicles, bikes, scooters, taxis, and ride-hailing services. They will have to offer competitive prices, quality service, and customer satisfaction to attract and retain customers. They will also have to compete with other robotaxi companies that may enter the market in the future, such as Uber (UBER), Lyft (LYFT), Zoox (AMZN), or Tesla (TSLA).