Egypt and Jordan have called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza during talks at the Bled Strategic Forum in Slovenia on September 1, 2025. Foreign Ministers Badr Abdelatty of Egypt and Ayman Safadi of Jordan condemned Israeli aggression, rejected displacement policies, and supported a Palestinian state based on 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital.
Key Statements from the Meeting
The ministers met on the sidelines of the forum to discuss the ongoing crisis in occupied Palestine. They stressed the urgent need to stop the war, end the humanitarian suffering, and ensure aid reaches those in need without conditions.
Both leaders strongly opposed attempts to displace people, use starvation as a tactic, and expand settlements. They warned that these actions violate international law and make peace harder to achieve.
They urged major global powers to take responsibility and address the root causes of the conflict. Without action against what they called Israeli arrogance in the West Bank and Gaza, stability in the region remains out of reach.
Recent Ceasefire Efforts and Proposals
Talks for peace have picked up in recent weeks amid growing destruction in Gaza. Egypt, along with Qatar and the United States, announced efforts to broker a 60-day truce in August 2025, which would include hostage releases and more aid flowing into the area.
Hamas agreed to a similar proposal that suspends military actions for 60 days, with plans to free some hostages and bodies. This could lead to a full end to the nearly two-year war, according to Egyptian officials.
The United Nations chief renewed calls for a ceasefire after intense fighting in Gaza City forced thousands to flee. Over 796,000 people have been displaced since the ceasefire collapsed in March 2025.
| Recent Ceasefire Proposals | Key Details | Involved Parties |
|---|---|---|
| 60-Day Truce Plan | Suspends operations, releases 10 living and 18 slain hostages, increases aid | Egypt, Qatar, US, Hamas |
| Hamas Renewal Talks | Demands more aid before resuming negotiations | Hamas, Mediators |
| UN Call Amid Destruction | Urges immediate halt after airstrikes in Gaza City | United Nations |
These efforts show a push for short-term relief while aiming for longer-term solutions.
Support for Palestinian State on 1967 Borders
Egypt and Jordan reaffirmed their backing for an independent Palestinian state on the June 4, 1967 borders. This stance aligns with their long-held view that East Jerusalem should serve as the capital.
The 1967 borders refer to lines drawn after the Six-Day War, when Israel took control of the West Bank from Jordan, Gaza and Sinai from Egypt, and Golan Heights from Syria. Egypt later regained Sinai through peace talks, but other areas remain disputed.
- The borders are based on 1949 armistice lines, not formal boundaries, as defined in agreements at the time.
- Jordan renounced claims to the West Bank in 1988, leaving the territory disputed rather than occupied under some views.
- International calls often push for a two-state solution using these lines to resolve the conflict.
This position rejects any changes through force and calls for global recognition of Palestine.
Logical reasoning suggests that sticking to these borders could prevent further violence by addressing core grievances. Recent events, like the training of Palestinian police in Egypt and Jordan for Gaza deployment, point to preparations for stability once fighting stops.
Broader Regional and International Reactions
The call comes as other nations and groups react to the crisis. Hamas has criticized the international community for inaction, calling it a disgrace amid starvation in Gaza.
Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have pushed for Palestinians to leave Gaza, which Egypt and Jordan firmly oppose. Meanwhile, 600 Israeli security officials urged the US to help end the war.
Arab mediators continue to work on plans, with a Hamas delegation heading to Egypt for talks. The World Food Program met with Israeli military leaders to discuss aid delivery, highlighting the dire humanitarian needs.
Public sentiment on social media reflects frustration, with many pointing to historical contexts like the 1948 war and armistice lines. These reactions underscore the need for a balanced approach that considers all sides.
Challenges and Path Forward
Ongoing military actions complicate peace efforts. Israeli operations in Gaza City have led to massive destruction, forcing more people to flee and worsening the crisis.
Training programs for Palestinian police in Egypt and Jordan aim to build security for a post-war Gaza. This could help maintain order and support a transition to Palestinian control.
Experts argue that without addressing settlements and displacement, any truce will be temporary. A lasting solution requires commitment from all parties to the two-state vision.
What do you think about these developments? Share your thoughts in the comments and spread the word to raise awareness about the push for peace in Gaza.
